Original detail was not sufficiently recovered
In these three cases, fine hairs and brushwork were not fully recovered, and contours also changed. Faithful restoration was not demonstrated under these conditions.
IMAGE REPAIR · COMPARATIVE STUDY
Compare contours and texture in the input, AI upscale and retouch at the same position and scale. The high-resolution reference provides a basis for inspecting the original details.
Select the original or any processing stage independently on either side. All views use the same image coordinates and scale. At 100%, one source pixel corresponds to one CSS pixel. Scroll larger views within each frame; the three detail views pan together.
The high-resolution reference and your selected left and right images. Region, scale and blend settings follow the comparison above. Scroll within each frame when an image is larger than the frame.
In these three cases, fine hairs and brushwork were not fully recovered, and contours also changed. Faithful restoration was not demonstrated under these conditions.
A weaker blend stays closer to the AI upscale. Reducing a change and recovering the original detail are separate outcomes.
The abstract painting shows changes to a band position and signature. Natural appearance alone cannot establish preservation of shape and content.
Loading images…
This comparison covers three images and one retouch run per image. Generalization, artist acceptance, production quality, labor and cost have not been evaluated.
This page compares saved images. It does not upload images or run AI processing. Image sources, licenses & detailed method →